Eagle, Antony (2003) 21 Arguments Against Propensity Analyses of Probability. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF Download (162Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Several arguments against various propensity analyses of probability are proposed. Though not all of the arguments are of equal worth, their diversity and number make the prospect of a successful propensity analysis of probability seem unlikely.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Other |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | propensity |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
| Depositing User: | Antony Eagle |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2003 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:11 |
| Item ID: | 1319 |
| Public Domain: | No |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1319 |
Available Versions of this Item
- 20 Arguments Against Propensity Analyses of Probability. (deposited 12 Aug 2003)
- 21 Arguments Against Propensity Analyses of Probability. (deposited 12 Aug 2003)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}