PhilSci Archive

Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism

Tabery, James (2003) Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (135Kb)


    Stuart Glennan, and the team of Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden and Carl Craver have recently provided two accounts of the concept of a mechanism. The main difference between these two versions rests on how the behavior of the parts of the mechanism is conceptualized. Glennan considers mechanisms to be an interaction of parts, where the interaction between parts can be characterized by direct, invariant, change-relating generalizations. Machamer, Darden, and Craver criticize traditional conceptualizations of mechanisms which are based solely on parts interacting and introduce a new concept—activity. This essay is an attempt at carving out a relationship between these two philosophical interpretations of a mechanism. I will claim that, rather than being in conflict, Glennan’s concept of interaction and Machamer, Darden, and Craver’s notion of activity actually complement one another, each emphasizing a missing element of the other.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: activity, causation, explanation, invariance, interaction, interactivity, mechanism, productivity
    Subjects: General Issues > Causation
    General Issues > Explanation
    Depositing User: James Tabery
    Date Deposited: 02 Oct 2003
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:12
    Item ID: 1428

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads