PhilSci Archive

Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism

Tabery, James (2003) Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Synthesizing_Activities_and_Interactions_in_the_Concept_of_a_Mechanism.doc

Download (138kB)

Abstract

Stuart Glennan, and the team of Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden and Carl Craver have recently provided two accounts of the concept of a mechanism. The main difference between these two versions rests on how the behavior of the parts of the mechanism is conceptualized. Glennan considers mechanisms to be an interaction of parts, where the interaction between parts can be characterized by direct, invariant, change-relating generalizations. Machamer, Darden, and Craver criticize traditional conceptualizations of mechanisms which are based solely on parts interacting and introduce a new concept—activity. This essay is an attempt at carving out a relationship between these two philosophical interpretations of a mechanism. I will claim that, rather than being in conflict, Glennan’s concept of interaction and Machamer, Darden, and Craver’s notion of activity actually complement one another, each emphasizing a missing element of the other.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Tabery, James
Keywords: activity, causation, explanation, invariance, interaction, interactivity, mechanism, productivity
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
General Issues > Explanation
Depositing User: James Tabery
Date Deposited: 02 Oct 2003
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:12
Item ID: 1428
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1428

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item