Holster, Andrew (2003) The incompleteness of extensional object languages of physics and time reversal. Part 2. [Preprint]
| Microsoft Word (.doc) Download (261Kb) |
Abstract
This continues from Part 1. It is shown how an intensional interpretation of physics object languages can be formalised, and how a syntactic compositional time reversal operator can subsequently be defined. This is applied to solve the problems used as examples in Part 1. A proof of a general theorem that such an operator must be defineable (for any general transformation) is sketched. A number of related issues about the interpretation of theories of physics, including classical and quantum mechanics and classical EM theory are discussed.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | time reversal, logic of physics, intensional semantics for physics |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics |
| Depositing User: | [Nil] [Nil] |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2003 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:12 |
| Item ID: | 1452 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1452 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


