PhilSci Archive

The time reversal invariance of classical electromagnetic theory: Albert versus Malament.

Holster, Andrew (2003) The time reversal invariance of classical electromagnetic theory: Albert versus Malament. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (172Kb)

    Abstract

    David Albert has recently argued that classical electromagnetic theory (EM) is not time reversal invariant (non-TRI), while David Malament rejects this argument and maintains the orthodox result, that EM is TRI. Both Albert's and Malament's arguments are analysed, and both are found wanting in certain respects. It is argued here that the result really depends on the choice of theoretical ontology choosen to interpret EM theory, and there is more than one plausible choice. Albert and Malament have choosen different plausible ontologies; but neither shows that their choice of interpretation is definitive. Deeper principles about this choice are examined. The extension to EM theory with magnetic monopoles is also examined. It is concluded that, despite certain flaws in his account, Albert's analysis does reveal serious problems in the orthodox account, which Malament's response does not adequately address.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: time reversal invariance, electromagnetic theory, David Albert, David Malament,
    Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics
    Specific Sciences > Physics
    Depositing User: [Nil] [Nil]
    Date Deposited: 18 Nov 2003
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:12
    Item ID: 1475
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1475

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads