Batterman, Robert (2004) Response to Belot's "Whose Devil? Which Details?". [Preprint]
![[img]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF Download (102Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
I respond to Belot's argument and defend the view that sometimes "fundamental" are explanatorily inadequate and need to be supplemented with certain aspects of less fundamental "theories emeritus."
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Commentary on: | Belot, Gordon(2003) Whose Devil? Which Details? [Preprint] |
| Keywords: | Explanation, Asymptotics, Intertheoretic Relations |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Models and Idealization General Issues > Explanation Specific Sciences > Physics |
| Depositing User: | Robert Batterman |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2004 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:12 |
| Item ID: | 1623 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1623 |
Commentary/Response Threads
- Belot, GordonWhose Devil? Which Details? (deposited 14 Dec 2003)
- Batterman, RobertResponse to Belot's "Whose Devil? Which Details?". (deposited 18 Feb 2004)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}