PhilSci Archive

A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument

Franceschi, Paul (2004) A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (182Kb) | Preview
    [img]
    Preview
    HTML
    Download (182Kb) | Preview

      Abstract

      In this paper, I present a solution to the Doomsday argument based on a third type of solution, by contrast to on the one hand, the Carter-Leslie view and on the other hand, the Eckhardt et al. analysis. I begin by strengthening both competing models by highlighting some variations of their ancestors models, which renders them less vulnerable to some objections. I describe then a third line of solution, which incorporates insights from both Leslie and Eckhardt's models and fits more adequately with the human situation corresponding to DA. I argue then that this two-sided analogy casts new light on the reference class problem. This leads finally to a novel formulation of the argument that could well be more consensual than the original one.


      Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
      Social Networking:

      Item Type: Preprint
      Additional Information: major revision
      Keywords: determinism, Doomsday argument, urn analogy
      Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
      General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism
      Depositing User: Paul Franceschi
      Date Deposited: 02 Sep 2004
      Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:12
      Item ID: 1925
      URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1925

      Available Versions of this Item

      Actions (login required)

      View Item

      Document Downloads