PhilSci Archive

A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument

Franceschi, Paul (2004) A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.


Download (186kB)

Download (186kB)


In this paper, I present a solution to the Doomsday argument based on a third type of solution, by contrast to on the one hand, the Carter-Leslie view and on the other hand, the Eckhardt et al. analysis. I begin by strengthening both competing models by highlighting some variations of their ancestors models, which renders them less vulnerable to some objections. I describe then a third line of solution, which incorporates insights from both Leslie and Eckhardt's models and fits more adequately with the human situation corresponding to DA. I argue then that this two-sided analogy casts new light on the reference class problem. This leads finally to a novel formulation of the argument that could well be more consensual than the original one.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Franceschi, Paul
Additional Information: major revision
Keywords: determinism, Doomsday argument, urn analogy
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism
Depositing User: Paul Franceschi
Date Deposited: 02 Sep 2004
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:12
Item ID: 1925

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item