Indeterminism in Neurobiology: Some Good and Some Bad News.
I examine some philosophical arguments as well as current empirical research in molecular neurobiology in order to throw some new light on the question of whether neurological processes are deterministic or indeterministic. I begin by showing that the idea of an autonomous biological indeterminism violates the principle of the supervenience of biological properties on physical properties. If supervenience is accepted, quantum mechanics is the only hope for the neuro-indeterminist. But this would require that indeterministic quantum-mechanical effects play a role in the functioning of the nervous system. I examine several candidates of molecular processes where this could, in theory, be the case. It turns out that there is good news from recent work on ion channels. Unfortunately (for the indeterminist), this good news is neutralised at once by bad news.
Conference or Workshop Item
||Specific Sciences > Biology
||14 Nov 2004
||07 Oct 2010 15:13
||17-20 November 2004
Available Versions of this Item
Indeterminism in Neurobiology: Some Good and Some Bad News. (deposited 14 Nov 2004)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)