PhilSci Archive

Falsification of Theories without Verification of Basic Statements – An Argument for the Possibility of Knowledge Growth

Maurer, Rainer Willi (2004) Falsification of Theories without Verification of Basic Statements – An Argument for the Possibility of Knowledge Growth. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (112Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    Karl Popper rightly contests the possibility of a verification of basic statements. At the same time he strictly believes in the possibility of growth of empirical knowledge. Knowledge growth, however, is only possible if empirical theories can be falsified. This raises the question, how theories can be falsified, if a verification of those statements that falsify theories – i.e. basic statements – is not possible. This problem is often referred to as the “basic problem” or “prob-lem of the empirical basis”. In this paper I show that – from a logical point of view – a falsification of theories is possible without a verification of basic state-ments. Furthermore I show that knowledge growth in the empirical sciences will be possible if two assumptions are valid. These assumptions can neither be proven nor falsified. However, they have to be postulated by everybody in eve-ryday life.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: epistemology, basic problem, falsification, verification, falsification of theories, verification of basic statements, basic statements, growth of empirical knowledge, growth of knowledge, theory of knowledge growth, versisimilitude
    Subjects: General Issues > Philosophers of Science
    Depositing User: Rainer Willi Maurer
    Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2005
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:13
    Item ID: 2188
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2188

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads