PhilSci Archive

The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime

Dorato, Mauro (2005) The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
ontology_Minkowski.doc

Download (158kB)

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the debate between the so-called “presentists” – according to whom only the present is real – and the “eternalists”, according to whom past present and future are equally real, has no ontological significance. In particular, once we carefully distinguish between a tensed and a tenseless sense of existence, it is difficult to find a single ontological claim on which the two parties could disagree. Since the choice of using a tense or a tenseless language is dictated by purely pragmatic reasons, we should abstain from bringing to bear pseudo-debates generated by the “tensed” or the “tenseless theories” of time on the question of understanding the philosophical implications of contemporary spacetime theories, or notions like becoming, change and persistence in time.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Dorato, Mauro
Keywords: Presentism, eternalism, Minkowski spacetime, Ontology
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Depositing User: Mauro Dorato
Date Deposited: 01 Mar 2005
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:13
Item ID: 2214
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2214

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item