PhilSci Archive

The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime

Dorato, Mauro (2005) The irrelevance of the presentist/eternalist debate for the ontology of Minkowski spacetime. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (155Kb)

    Abstract

    In this paper I argue that the debate between the so-called “presentists” – according to whom only the present is real – and the “eternalists”, according to whom past present and future are equally real, has no ontological significance. In particular, once we carefully distinguish between a tensed and a tenseless sense of existence, it is difficult to find a single ontological claim on which the two parties could disagree. Since the choice of using a tense or a tenseless language is dictated by purely pragmatic reasons, we should abstain from bringing to bear pseudo-debates generated by the “tensed” or the “tenseless theories” of time on the question of understanding the philosophical implications of contemporary spacetime theories, or notions like becoming, change and persistence in time.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: Presentism, eternalism, Minkowski spacetime, Ontology
    Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
    Depositing User: Mauro Dorato
    Date Deposited: 01 Mar 2005
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:13
    Item ID: 2214
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2214

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads