Saunders, Simon (2000) Tense and Indeterminateness. [Preprint]
| PDF Download (99Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Is tense real and objective? Can the fact that something is past, say, be wholly objective, consistent with special relativity? The answer is yes, but only so long as the distinction has no ontological ground. There is a closely related question. Is the contrast between the determinate and the indeterminate real and objective, consistent with relativity and quantum mechanics? The answer is again yes, but only if the contrast has no ontological ground. Various accounts of it are explored, according to different approaches to quantum mechanics. The Everett interpretation is much the most successful in accounting for it.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Published in PSA Proceedings Vol. 67, S600-11 |
| Keywords: | presentism, possibilism, Everett, quantum mechanics, special relativity, stochasticity |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory |
| Depositing User: | simon saunders |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Mar 2005 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:13 |
| Item ID: | 2241 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2241 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


