Monton, Bradley (2005) Presentism and Quantum Gravity. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
| PDF Download (57Kb) | Preview | |
| Microsoft Word (.doc) Download (118Kb) |
Abstract
There is a philosophical tradition of arguing against presentism, the thesis that only presently existing things exist, on the basis of its incompatibility with fundamental physics. I grant that presentism is incompatible with special and general relativity, but argue that presentism is not incompatible with quantum gravity, because there are some theories of quantum gravity that utilize a fixed foliation of spacetime. I reply to various objections to this defense of presentism, and point out a flaw in Gödel’s modal argument for the ideality of time. This paper provides an interesting case study of the interplay between physics and philosophy.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | constant mean curvature, fixed foliation, Mark Hinchliff, Gordon Belot, John Earman, Craig Callender, Kurt Gödel |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Field Theory |
| Depositing User: | Bradley Monton |
| Date Deposited: | 19 May 2005 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:13 |
| Item ID: | 2308 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2308 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Presentism and Quantum Gravity. (deposited 26 Mar 2002)
- Presentism and Quantum Gravity. (deposited 19 May 2005)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


