PhilSci Archive

Disentangling Scientific Representation

Contessa, Gabriele (2005) Disentangling Scientific Representation. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (102Kb)

    Abstract

    The main aim of this paper is to disentangle three senses in which we can say that a model represents a system—denotation epistemic representation, and successful epistemic representation--and to individuate what questions arise from each sense of the notion of representation as used in this context. Also, I argue that a model is an epistemic representation of a system only if a user adopts a general interpretation of the model in terms of a system. In the process, I hope to clarify where those who, following Craig Callander and Jonathan Cohen, claim that there is no special problem about scientific representation go wrong. In the terminology adopted here, even if scientific representation is only an instance of epistemic representation, scientific representation should not be confounded with denotation.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Other
    Commentary on: Callender, Craigand Cohen, Jonathan (2005) There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation. [Preprint]
    Keywords: scientific models; representation; surrogative reasoning;
    Subjects: General Issues > Models and Idealization
    Depositing User: Gabriele Contessa
    Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2005
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:13
    Item ID: 2436
    Public Domain: No
    Commentary on: Callender, Craig and Cohen, Jonathan (2005) There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation.
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2436

    Commentary/Response Threads

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads