PhilSci Archive

Disentangling Scientific Representation

Contessa, Gabriele (2005) Disentangling Scientific Representation. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Paper_-_Disentangling_Scientific_Representation_(PhilSci).doc

Download (104kB)

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to disentangle three senses in which we can say that a model represents a system—denotation epistemic representation, and successful epistemic representation--and to individuate what questions arise from each sense of the notion of representation as used in this context. Also, I argue that a model is an epistemic representation of a system only if a user adopts a general interpretation of the model in terms of a system. In the process, I hope to clarify where those who, following Craig Callander and Jonathan Cohen, claim that there is no special problem about scientific representation go wrong. In the terminology adopted here, even if scientific representation is only an instance of epistemic representation, scientific representation should not be confounded with denotation.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Other
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Contessa, Gabriele
Commentary on: Callender, Craig and Cohen, Jonathan (2005) There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation. [Preprint]
Keywords: scientific models; representation; surrogative reasoning;
Subjects: General Issues > Models and Idealization
Depositing User: Gabriele Contessa
Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2005
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:13
Item ID: 2436
Public Domain: No
Commentary on: Callender, Craig and Cohen, Jonathan (2005) There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation.
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2436

Commentary/Response Threads

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item