PhilSci Archive

When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr--Einstein debate

Landsman, Nicolaas P. (2005) When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr--Einstein debate. UNSPECIFIED. (In Press)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (338Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    Einstein's philosophy of physics (as clarified by Fine, Howard, and Held) was predicated on his Trennungsprinzip, a combination of separability and locality, without which he believed objectification, and thereby "physical thought" and "physical laws", to be impossible. Bohr's philosophy (as elucidated by Hooker, Scheibe, Folse, Howard, Held, and others), on the other hand, was grounded in a seemingly different doctrine about the possibility of objective knowledge, namely the necessity of classical concepts. In fact, it follows from Raggio's Theorem in algebraic quantum theory that - within an appropriate class of physical theories - suitable mathematical translations of the doctrines of Bohr and Einstein are equivalent. Thus - upon our specific formalization - quantum mechanics accommodates Einstein's Trennungsprinzip if and only if it is interpreted a la Bohr through classical physics. Unfortunately, the protagonists themselves failed to discuss their differences in this constructive way, since their debate was dominated by Einstein's ingenious but ultimately flawed attempts to establish the "incompleteness" of quantum mechanics. This aspect of their debate may still be understood and appreciated, however, as reflecting a much deeper and insurmountable disagreement between Bohr and Einstein about the knowability of Nature. Using the theological controversy on the knowability of God as a analogy, we can say that Einstein was a Spinozist, whereas Bohr could be said to be on the side of Maimonides. Thus Einstein's off-the-cuff characterization of Bohr as a 'Talmudic philosopher' was spot-on.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Other
    Keywords: Bohr-Einstein debate, EPR, objectification, completeness of quantum mechanics, Raggio's Theorem
    Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics
    Depositing User: Nicolaas P. Landsman
    Date Deposited: 01 Nov 2005
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:13
    Item ID: 2503
    Public Domain: Yes
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2503

    Available Versions of this Item

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads