PhilSci Archive

On Universals: An extensionalist alternative to Quine's resemblance theory

Stemmer, Nathan (2005) On Universals: An extensionalist alternative to Quine's resemblance theory. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (178Kb)


    Abstract The notion of similarity plays a central role in Quine's theory of Universals and it is with the help of this notion that Quine intends to define the concept of kind which also plays a central role in the theory. But as Quine has admitted, his attempts to define kinds in terms of similarities were unsuccessful and it is mainly because of this shortcoming that Quine's theory has been ignored by several philosophers. In the present paper, I propose an alternative framework that accounts for the phenomena that Quine intends to explain with his resemblance theory. The framework agrees with Quine's austere ontology; in particular, it does not assume the existence of properties and of possible worlds. Moreover, the framework is extensionalist since the abstract entities it assumes are classes and these can be individuated extensionally. Finally, I will refute some of the objections to Quine's approach that have been raised by Malcolm and Oliver and I will argue that, contrary to what has been claimed, Quine is able to specify an important set of sparse properties.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Other
    Keywords: Keywords: Universals, resemblance, sparse properties, Armstrong, Lewis, Oliver, Quine, Rodriguez-Pereyra.
    Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
    General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
    Depositing User: Nathan Stemmer
    Date Deposited: 16 Dec 2005
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:13
    Item ID: 2566
    Public Domain: No

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads