Monton, Bradley (2006) Is Intelligent Design Science? Dissecting the Dover Decision. [Preprint]
In the case of Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al., Judge Jones ruled that a pro-intelligent design disclaimer cannot be read to public school students. In his decision, he gave demarcation criteria for what counts as science, ruling that intelligent design fails these criteria. I argue that these criteria are flawed, with most of my focus on the criterion of methodological naturalism. The way to refute intelligent design is not by declaring it unscientific, but by showing that the empirical evidence for design is not there.
|Social Networking:|| |
Available Versions of this Item
- Is Intelligent Design Science? Dissecting the Dover Decision. (deposited 04 Jan 2006)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)