PhilSci Archive

Is Intelligent Design Science? Dissecting the Dover Decision

Monton, Bradley (2006) Is Intelligent Design Science? Dissecting the Dover Decision. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (73Kb)

    Abstract

    In the case of Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al., Judge Jones ruled that a pro-intelligent design disclaimer cannot be read to public school students. In his decision, he gave demarcation criteria for what counts as science, ruling that intelligent design fails these criteria. I argue that these criteria are flawed, with most of my focus on the criterion of methodological naturalism. The way to refute intelligent design is not by declaring it unscientific, but by showing that the empirical evidence for design is not there.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: intelligent design, creationism, demarcation question, methodological naturalism, non-science, psuedoscience, Robert Pennock, Barbara Forrest, William Dembski
    Subjects: General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
    General Issues > Science and Religion
    Depositing User: Bradley Monton
    Date Deposited: 19 Jan 2006
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:13
    Item ID: 2592
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2592

    Available Versions of this Item

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads