Dieks' Realistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Comment.
D. Dieks has proposed a semantical rule which he claims yields a realistic interpretation of the formalism of quantum mechanics without the projection postulate. I argue that his proposal is unacceptable because it violates a natural requirement of psychophysical parallelism. His "semantical rule" is not an acceptable interpretive rule because it does not identify structures in the theory with structures in our experience, but postulates a merely probabilistic relationship between the two. Dieks' interpretation is contrasted with Everett's relative state interpretation, which attempts the same task but respects psychophysical parallelism.
||Unpublished 1990 preprint, has seen some limited circulation since then.
||quantum mechanics modal interpretation Dieks probabilities psychophysical parallelism
||Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics
||09 Mar 2006
||07 Oct 2010 15:13
||D. Dieks, "Quantum Mechanics Without the Projection Postulate and its Realistic Interpretation", Foundations of Physics vol. 19, pp. 1397-1423 (1989)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)