PhilSci Archive

Et tu mi fili, Thomas?!

Brendel, Mátyás (2006) Et tu mi fili, Thomas?! [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
et_tu_mi_fili-eng.pdf

Download (165kB)

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper I use or refer to a lot of metaphors, like "Brutus" for Kuhn, "Trojan Horse" for the Structure, "adopted sons" for Quine and Popper, "battlefield" for parts of philosophy. These are however only illustrations to possible theses or questions I investigate: "Did Kuhn refute logical positivism?", Why was Carnap so tolerating so much Popper, Quine and Kuhn?", "Why did logical positivism go away?". I will argue that a complex view should be developed abut these questions synthesising both Friedman's, Irzik's, Earman's, and Reisch's view on the one hand and Oliveira's on the other hand, who is criticising them. I try to sketch this complex view, which of course is not an attempt to a full story of logical positivism. Finally I describe Carnap's Principle of Tolerance as not merely a theory, but as a personal, ethical view, which he adopted in his behaviour with Kuhn, Popper, Quine and other rival philosophers.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Brendel, Mátyás
Keywords: History of Philosophy of Science, Carnap, Kuhn, Revisionism, Logical Positivism, Logical Empiricism
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > Philosophers of Science
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Depositing User: Mátyás Brendel
Date Deposited: 21 Mar 2006
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:13
Item ID: 2661
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2661

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item