PhilSci Archive

A critical examination of Abner Shimony's Transient Now

hepburn, brian (2006) A critical examination of Abner Shimony's Transient Now. UNSPECIFIED.

Download (129Kb) | Preview


    I criticize Shimony's argument from the Transient Now (Shimony 1993) that the B-series view of time is inadequate but offer a reading of that argument that is more charitable than one offered and rejected by Eilstein (1996). Shimony's argument turns on putative phenomenological features of the Now (singularity and numerical identity) but transience only arises as a logical implication of those features. Transience is thus a second order phenomenon. If these two features are accurate then the B-series cannot provide a complete account of the Now and Eilstein misses the role of Shimony's Phenomenological Principle (PP) in this regard. Holding a B-theoretic view then demands giving up the numerical identity of person-slices across time.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Other
    Keywords: Time, Shimony, transient, Now, McTaggart
    Subjects: General Issues > Philosophers of Science
    Depositing User: brian hepburn
    Date Deposited: 04 Oct 2006
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:14
    Item ID: 2935

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads