Balashov on Special Relativity, Coexistence, and Temporal Parts.
Yuri Balashov has argued that endurantism (the view that material objects persist by being wholly present at each moment of their careers) is untenable in the context of Minkowski spacetime. Balashov’s argument runs through two main theses concerning the relation of coexistence, or temporal co-location. (1) Coexistence must turn out to be an absolute or objective matter; and in Minkowski spacetime coexistence must be grounded in the relation of spacelike separation. (2) If endurantism is true, then (1) leads to absurd conclusions; but if perdurantism is true, then (1) is harmless. I object to both theses. Against (1), I argue that coexistence is better construed as being relative to a hyperplane of simultaneity. Against (2), I argue that the consequences of (1) given endurantism are no worse than the consequences of (1) given perdurantism.
||This paper was published in Philosophical Studies 109: 241-263 (June 2002).
||Balashov, persistence, endurance, perdurance, endurantism, perdurantism, three-dimensionalism, four-dimensionalism, temporal parts, wholly present, special relativity, Minkowski, coexistence
||Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Specific Sciences > Physics
||15 Oct 2006
||07 Oct 2010 15:14
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)