PhilSci Archive

Duhem, Quine and the other dogma

Afriat, Alexander (2006) Duhem, Quine and the other dogma. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
Download (113Kb) | Preview


    By linking meaning and analyticity (through synonymy), Quine rejects both “dogmas of empiricism” together, as “two sides of a single dubious coin.” His rejection of the second (“reductionism”) has been associated with Duhem’s argument against crucial experiments — which relies on fundamental differences, brought up again and again, between mathematics and physics. The other dogma rejected by Quine is the “cleavage between analytic and synthetic truths”; but aren’t the truths of mathematics analytic, those of physics synthetic? Exploiting Quine’s association of essences, meaning, synonymy and analyticity, and appealing to a ‘model-theoretical’ notion of abstract test derived from Duhem and Quine — which can be used to overcome their holism by separating essences from accidents — I reconsider the ‘crucial experiment,’ the aforementioned “cleavage,” and the differences Duhem attributed to mathematics and physics; and propose a characterisation of the meaning and reference of sentences, which extends, in a natural way, the distinction as it applies to words.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: Duhem, Quine, analytic, synthetic, holism, meaning, reference
    Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
    General Issues > Models and Idealization
    General Issues > Reductionism/Holism
    General Issues > Experimentation
    Depositing User: Alexander Afriat
    Date Deposited: 13 Nov 2006
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:14
    Item ID: 3046

    Available Versions of this Item

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads