PhilSci Archive

Two notions of scientific justification

Adam, Matthias (2006) Two notions of scientific justification. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
justification.pdf

Download (172kB)

Abstract

Scientific claims can be assessed epistemically in either of two ways: according to scientific standards, or by means of philosophical arguments such as the no-miracle argument in favor of scientific realism. This paper investigates the basis of this duality of epistemic assessments. It is claimed that the duality rests on two different notions of epistemic justification that are well-known from the debate on internalism and externalism in general epistemology: a deontological and an alethic notion. By discussing the conditions for the scientific acceptability of empirical results, it is argued that intrascientific justification employs the deontological notion. Philosophical disputes such as those on scientific realism can by contrast be shown to rest on the alethic notion. The implications of these findings both for the nature of the respective epistemic projects and for their interrelation are explored.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Adam, Matthias
Keywords: Scientific justification; Methodology; Scientific realism; Epistemology of science; Internalism and externalism
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Depositing User: Matthias Adam
Date Deposited: 19 Nov 2006
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:14
Item ID: 3053
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3053

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item