PhilSci Archive

On the Continuity of Reference of the Elements. A Response to Hendry.

Scerri, Eric (2006) On the Continuity of Reference of the Elements. A Response to Hendry. UNSPECIFIED.

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (83Kb)

    Abstract

    Robin Hendry has recently argued that although the term ‘element’ has traditionally been used in two different senses, (basic substance and simple substance), there has nonetheless been a continuity of reference. The present article examines this author’s historical and philosophical claims and suggests that he has misdiagnosed the situation in several respects. In particular it is claimed that Hendry’s arguments for the nature of one particular element, oxygen, do not generalize to all elements as he implies. The second main objection is to Hendry’s view that the qua problem can be illuminated by appeal to the intention of scientists


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Other
    Keywords: chemistry, causal theory of reference, Lavoisier, element, Mendeleev, Dalton, Putnam & Kripke, Paneth
    Subjects: Specific Sciences > Chemistry
    Depositing User: Eric Scerri
    Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2006
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:14
    Item ID: 3063
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3063

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads