Weber, Marcel (2007) The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Confirmation in Molecular Biology. In: [2007] LSE-Pitt Conference: Confirmation, Induction and Science (London, 8 - 10 March, 2007).

There is a more recent version of this item available.

Microsoft Word (.doc) Download (1823Kb)

Abstract

I defend the view that single experiments can provide a sufficient reason for preferring one among a group of hypotheses against the widely held belief that “crucial experiments” are impossible. My argument is based on the examination of a historical case from molecular biology, namely the Meselson-Stahl experiment. “The most beautiful experiment in biology”, as it is known, provided the first experimental evidence for the operation of a semi-conservative mechanism of DNA replication, as predicted by Watson and Crick in 1953. I use a mechanistic account of explanation to show that this case is best construed as an inference to the best explanation (IBE). Furthermore, I show how such an account can deal with Duhem's well-known arguments against crucial experiments as well as Van Fraassen's “bad lot” argument against IBE.

Available Versions of this Item

• The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Confirmation in Molecular Biology. (deposited 06 Mar 2007)[Currently Displayed]
  • The Crux of Crucial Experiments: Duhem’s Problems and Inference to the Best Explanation. (deposited 03 Mar 2008)

Actions (login required)