PhilSci Archive

Regularity Theories Reassessed

Baumgartner, Michael (2007) Regularity Theories Reassessed. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
regul_recon3.pdf

Download (221kB)

Abstract

For a long time, regularity accounts of causation have virtually vanished from the scene. Problems encountered within other theoretical frameworks have recently induced authors working on causation, laws of nature, or methodologies of causal reasoning -- as e.g. May (1999), Ragin (2000), Grasshoff & May (2001), Swartz (2003), Halpin (2003), Hall (2004), Beebee (2006) -- to direct their attention back to regularity theoretic analyses. In light of the latest proposals of regularity theories, the paper at hand therefore reassesses the criticism brought forward against regularity accounts since Mackie's famous, yet failed, (1974) attempts at analyzing causation with recourse to regularities among types of events. It is shown that most of these objections target strikingly over-simplified regularity theoretic sketches. By outlining ways to refute these objections it is argued that the prevalent conviction as to the overall failure of regularity theories has been hasty.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Baumgartner, Michael
Keywords: Causation, Regularity Theory, Determinism
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Depositing User: Michael Baumgartner
Date Deposited: 21 Oct 2007
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:15
Item ID: 3610
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3610

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item