PhilSci Archive

How to disagree about how to disagree

Elga, Adam (2007) How to disagree about how to disagree. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (115Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    When one encounters disagreement about the truth of a factual claim from a trusted advisor who has access to all of one's evidence, should that move one in the direction of the advisor's view? Conciliatory views on disagreement say "yes, at least a little." Such views are extremely natural, but they can give incoherent advice when the issue under dispute is disagreement itself. So conciliatory views stand refuted. But despite first appearances, this makes no trouble for *partly* conciliatory views: views that recommend giving ground in the face of disagreement about many matters, but not about disagreement itself.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Additional Information: To appear in Richard Feldman and Ted Warfield (eds.) *Disagreement*, forthcoming from Oxford University Press. Please cite published version.
    Keywords: epistemology of disagreement, inductive methods, self-undermining
    Subjects: General Issues > Decision Theory
    Depositing User: Adam Elga
    Date Deposited: 07 Dec 2007
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:15
    Item ID: 3702
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3702

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads