PhilSci Archive

Making Contact with Observations

Votsis, Ioannis (2007) Making Contact with Observations. In: UNSPECIFIED.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
EPSA_Votsis.pdf

Download (52kB)

Abstract

A stalwart view in the philosophy of science holds that, even when broadly construed so as to include theoretical auxiliaries, theories cannot make direct contact with observations. This view owes much to Bogen and Woodward’s (1988) influential distinction between data and phenomena. According to them, data are typically the kind of things that are observable or measurable like "bubble chamber photographs, patterns of discharge in electronic particle detectors and records of reaction times and error rates in various psychological experiments" (p. 306). Phenomena are physical processes that are typically unobservable. Examples of the latter category include "weak neutral currents, the decay of the proton, and chunking and recency effects in human memory" (ibid.). Theories, in Bogen and Woodward’s view, are utilised to systematically explain, infer and predict phenomena, not data (pp. 305-306). The relationship between theories and data is rather indirect. Data count as evidence for phenomena and the latter in turn count as evidence for theories. This view is becoming increasingly influential (e.g. Prajit K. Basu (2003), Stathis Psillos (2004) and Mauricio Suárez (2005)). In this paper I argue contrary to this view that in various significant and well-known cases theories do make direct contact with the help of suitable auxiliaries.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Votsis, Ioannis
Keywords: confirmation, observation, theory, data, phenomena, novel predictions, inferential relations.
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Theory/Observation
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Depositing User: Dr Ioannis Votsis
Date Deposited: 19 Dec 2007
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:15
Item ID: 3706
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Theory/Observation
General Issues > Experimentation
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Date: 2007
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3706

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item