PhilSci Archive

Is There an Independent Principle of Causality in Physics? A Comment on Matthias Frisch, “Causal Reasoning in Physics.”

Norton, John D. (2008) Is There an Independent Principle of Causality in Physics? A Comment on Matthias Frisch, “Causal Reasoning in Physics.”. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
PDF
On_Frisch_PC_v2.pdf

Download (208kB)

Abstract

Matthias Frisch has argued that the requirement that electromagnetic dispersion processes are causal adds empirical content not found in electrodynamic theory. I urge that this attempt to reconstitute a local principle of causality in physics fails. An independent principle is not needed to recover the results of dispersion theory. The use of “causality conditions” prove to be either an exercise in relabeling an already presumed fact; or, if one seeks a broader, independently formulated grounding for the conditions, that grounding either fails or dissolves into vagueness and ambiguity, as has traditionally been the fate of candidate principles of causality.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Norton, John D.
Additional Information: For later versions, see http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton
Keywords: causality causation dispersion scattering
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics
General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Physics > Fields and Particles
Depositing User: John Norton
Date Deposited: 23 Jan 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:16
Item ID: 3832
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3832

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item