Norton, John D. (2008) Is There an Independent Principle of Causality in Physics? A Comment on Matthias Frisch, “Causal Reasoning in Physics.”. In: UNSPECIFIED.
Matthias Frisch has argued that the requirement that electromagnetic dispersion processes are causal adds empirical content not found in electrodynamic theory. I urge that this attempt to reconstitute a local principle of causality in physics fails. An independent principle is not needed to recover the results of dispersion theory. The use of “causality conditions” prove to be either an exercise in relabeling an already presumed fact; or, if one seeks a broader, independently formulated grounding for the conditions, that grounding either fails or dissolves into vagueness and ambiguity, as has traditionally been the fate of candidate principles of causality.
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Additional Information:||For later versions, see http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton|
|Keywords:||causality causation dispersion scattering|
|Subjects:||Specific Sciences > Physics > Classical Physics
General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Physics > Fields and Particles
|Depositing User:||John Norton|
|Date Deposited:||23 Jan 2008|
|Last Modified:||07 Oct 2010 15:16|
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)