Dietrich, Franz (2008) The premises of Condorcet's jury theorem are not simultaneously justified. UNSPECIFIED.
| PDF Download (172Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Condorcet's famous jury theorem reaches an optimistic conclusion on the correctness of majority decisions, based on two controversial premises about voters: they should be competent and vote independently, in a technical sense. I carefully analyse these premises and show that: (i) whether a premise is justified depends on the notion of uncertainty or probability employed; (ii) no such notion renders both premises simultaneously justified. Especially the independence assumption should be weakened.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Other |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Condorcet jury theorem, probability, social choice theory, epistemic democracy, social epistemology, common cause, causal network |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Confirmation/Induction General Issues > Causation Specific Sciences > Economics |
| Depositing User: | Franz Dietrich |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Mar 2008 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:16 |
| Item ID: | 3939 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3939 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


