PhilSci Archive

Determinism and the Antiquated Deontology of the Social Sciences

Ballinger, Clint (2008) Determinism and the Antiquated Deontology of the Social Sciences. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.


Download (224kB)


This article shows how the social sciences, particularly human geography, rejected hard determinism by the mid-twentieth century largely on the deontological basis that it is irreconcilable with social justice, yet this rejection came just before a burst of creative development in consequentialist theories of social justice that problematize a facile rejection of determinism on moral grounds, a development that has seldom been recognized in the social sciences. Thus many current social science and human geography views on determinism and social justice are antiquated, ignoring numerous common and well-respected arguments within philosophy that hard determinism can be reconciled with a just society. We support this argument by briefly tracing the parallel development of stances on determinism in the social sciences and the deontological-consequentialist debate in philosophy. The purpose of the article is to resituate social science and human geography debates on determinism and social justice within a modern ethical framework.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Ballinger, Clint
Keywords: consequentialist ethics; determinism; free will; social justice; human geography
Subjects: General Issues > Ethical Issues
Specific Sciences > Sociology
General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism
Depositing User: Clint Ballinger
Date Deposited: 07 Aug 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:16
Item ID: 4152

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item