PhilSci Archive

General relativity and the standard model: Why evidence for one does not disconfirm the other

Jones, Nicholaos (2008) General relativity and the standard model: Why evidence for one does not disconfirm the other. [Preprint]


Download (230kB)


General Relativity and the Standard Model often are touted as the most rigorously and extensively confirmed scientific hypotheses of all time. Nonetheless, these theories appear to have consequences that are inconsistent with evidence about phenomena for which, respectively, quantum effects and gravity matter. This paper suggests an explanation for why the theories are not disconfirmed by such evidence. The key to this explanation is an approach to scientific hypotheses that allows their actual content to differ from their apparent content. This approach does not appeal to ceteris-paribus qualifiers or counterfactuals or similarity relations. And it helps to explain why some highly idealized hypotheses are not treated in the way that a thoroughly refuted theory is treated but instead as hypotheses with limited domains of applicability.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Jones, Nicholaos
Additional Information: Forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Keywords: Confirmation; Distortion; General relativity; Standard model
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
General Issues > Models and Idealization
Depositing User: Nicholaos Jones
Date Deposited: 31 Oct 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:17
Item ID: 4267

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item