PhilSci Archive

How to be an Anti-Reductionist about Developmental Biology: Response to Laubichler and Wagner

Frost-Arnold, Greg (2004) How to be an Anti-Reductionist about Developmental Biology: Response to Laubichler and Wagner. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)

Download (100kB)


Alexander Rosenberg recently claimed (1997) that developmental biology is currently being reduced to molecular biology. Laubichler & Wagner (2001) cite several concrete biological examples that are intended to impugn Rosenberg’s claim. I first argue that although Laubichler and Wagner’s examples would refute a very strong reductionism, a more moderate reductionism would escape their attacks. Next, taking my cue from the antireductionist’s perennial stress on the importance of spatial organization, I describe one form an empirical finding that refutes this moderate reductionism would take. Finally, I point out an actual example, anterior-posterior axis determination in the chick, that challenges the reductionist’s belief that all developmental regularities can be explained by molecular biology. In short, I argue that Rosenberg’s position can be saved from Laubichler and Wagner’s criticisms and putative counter-examples, but it would not survive a different kind of counter-example.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Frost-Arnold, Greg
Additional Information: The final version of this preprint was published in Biology and Philosophy 19 (2004): 75-91.
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology > Molecular Biology/Genetics
General Issues > Reductionism/Holism
Specific Sciences > Biology > Developmental Biology
Depositing User: Greg Frost-Arnold
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:17
Item ID: 4269

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item