PhilSci Archive

Counterfactuals, Thought Experiments and Singular Causal Analysis in History

Reiss, Julian (2008) Counterfactuals, Thought Experiments and Singular Causal Analysis in History. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Fictions_and_Causes_PSA.pdf

Download (129kB)

Abstract

Thought experiments are ubiquitous in science but especially prominent in domains in which experimental and observational data are scarce. Thus, for instance, when the causal analysis of singular events such as the causes of a particular war, of the rise of a culture or of the economic performance of a country in a specific historical period is at stake. A longstanding tradition in history that goes back to Max Weber answers questions about the causes of singular historical events by means of ‘What-if?’ counterfactuals. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, I want to give a descriptive account of this widely used method in history. Second, I argue that historians who follow this method examine difference makers rather than causes in the philosophers’ sense, despite their surface rhetoric. I conclude that although difference making is neither necessary nor sufficient for causation in the philosophers’ sense, looking for difference makers is more consistent with the historians’ more ultimate purposes.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Reiss, Julian
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Depositing User: Julian Reiss
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:17
Item ID: 4281
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4281

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item