PhilSci Archive

The Paradox of Stasis and the Nature of Explanations in Evolutionary Biology

Kaplan, Jonathan (2008) The Paradox of Stasis and the Nature of Explanations in Evolutionary Biology. In: [2008] Philosophy of Science Assoc. 21st Biennial Mtg (Pittsburgh, PA) > PSA 2008 Contributed Papers.

[img] PDF
Download (51Kb)

    Abstract

    Recently, a paper by Estes and Arnold claimed to have “solved” the paradox of evolutionary stasis; they claim that stabilizing selection, and only stabilizing selection, can explain the patterns of evolutionary divergence observed over “all timescales”. While Estes and Arnold clearly think of their work as identifying the processes that produce evolutionary stasis, close attention to their claims reveal that they do no such thing. Instead, Estes and Arnold identify a particular evolutionary pattern – stabilizing selection as a statistical descriptor – but fail to identify the processes that produce that pattern. This mistake is important; the slippage between pattern and process is common in population and quantitative genetics, and contributes to a persistent misunderstanding of the nature of explanations in evolutionary biology.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
    Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory
    Conferences and Volumes: [2008] Philosophy of Science Assoc. 21st Biennial Mtg (Pittsburgh, PA) > PSA 2008 Contributed Papers
    Depositing User: Jonathan Kaplan
    Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2008
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:17
    Item ID: 4286
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4286

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads