PhilSci Archive

Defending the Semantic View: What it takes

Le Bihan, Soazig (2008) Defending the Semantic View: What it takes. In: UNSPECIFIED.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.

Download (177kB)


In this paper, a modest version of the Semantic View is motivated as both tenable and potentially fruitful for philosophy of science. An analysis is proposed in which the Semantic View is given as characterized by three main claims. For each of these claims, a distinction is made between stronger and more modest interpretations. It is argued that the criticisms recently leveled against the Semantic View hold only under the stronger interpretations of these claims. However, if one only commits to the modest interpretation for all the claims, then the view obtained, which is called the Modest Semantic View, is tenable and fruitful.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Le Bihan, Soazig
Keywords: Semantic View, Scientific Theories, Scientific Models, Model Theory, Suppes, van Fraassen, Morrison
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Depositing User: Dr. Soazig Le Bihan
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2008
Last Modified: 10 May 2011 02:26
Item ID: 4288
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Date: 2008

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item