PhilSci Archive

Are Stellar Kinds Natural Kinds? A Challenging Newcomer in the Monism/Pluralism and Realism/Antirealism Debates

Ruphy, Stéphanie (2008) Are Stellar Kinds Natural Kinds? A Challenging Newcomer in the Monism/Pluralism and Realism/Antirealism Debates. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
PDF
paper.pdf

Download (226kB)

Abstract

Stars are conspicuously absent from reflections on natural kinds and classifications, with gold, tiger, jade, and water getting all the philosophical attention. This is too bad for, as this paper will demonstrate, interesting philosophical lessons can be drawn from stellar taxonomy as regards two central, on-going debates about natural kinds, to wit, the monism/pluralism debate and the realism/antirealism debate. I show in particular that stellar kinds will not please the essentialist monist, nor for that matter will it please the pluralist embracing promiscuous realism à la Dupré. I conclude on a more general note by questioning the relationship between taxonomic scientific practice and philosophical doctrines of natural kinds.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Ruphy, Stéphanie
Keywords: natural kind ; classification ; monism ; pluralism ; realism ; antirealism ; stars ; astrophysics
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Stéphanie Ruphy
Date Deposited: 19 Nov 2008
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 18:56
Item ID: 4346
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4346

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item