PhilSci Archive

THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION AND KARL POPPER’S HYPOTHETICO-DEDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION

Afisi, Oseni Taiwo (2009) THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION AND KARL POPPER’S HYPOTHETICO-DEDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION. UNSPECIFIED.

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)
Download (74Kb)

    Abstract

    The focus of this paper is to examine the problem of induction as a methodology for science. It also evaluates Karl Popper’s deductive approach as the suitable methodology for scientific research. Popper calls his theory ‘hypothetico-deductive methodology’. However, this paper argues the thesis that Popper’s theory of hypothetico-deductive methodology, which he claims is the only appropriate methodology of science is fraught with some theoretical difficulties, which makes it unacceptable. Popper’s logical asymmetry between verification and falsification, we argue, is philosophically untenable. We argue the thesis for the complementarity of both inductive and deductive methodology in scientific investigation. This study seeks to establish the resonance of accepting both deductive and inductive reasoning as the basic methodologies upon which scientific research and discoveries proceed.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Other
    Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
    Depositing User: Oseni Taiwo Afisi
    Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2009
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:17
    Item ID: 4514
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4514

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads