PhilSci Archive

Is Engineering Philosophically Weak? A Linguistic and Institutional Analysis

Goldberg, David E. (2009) Is Engineering Philosophically Weak? A Linguistic and Institutional Analysis. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (48Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    This paper follows a paper by Mitcham and considers whether engineering is among a group of occupations he calls philosophically weak, in the sense that engineering does not aspire to good-in-themselves ideals as do medicine and law. The paper agrees that engineering is philosophically weak, but in the different sense that engineering is not as reflective upon its nature and place in the world as some other professions. The paper recovers Mitcham's distinction by consider the institutional complexity of a given occupation, suggesting that engineering's practice in the context of complex institutional arrangements precludes the relative ethical simplicity of such occupations as medicine and law.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: philosophically weak, ethically simple, ideals, institutionally complex, profession, occupation
    Subjects: General Issues > Ethical Issues
    Depositing User: David E. Goldberg
    Date Deposited: 24 Mar 2009
    Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 11:17
    Item ID: 4532
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4532

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads