PhilSci Archive

Some Laws of Nature are Metaphysically Contingent

Roberts, John (2009) Some Laws of Nature are Metaphysically Contingent. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (.doc)

Download (136kB)


Laws of nature are puzzling because they have a ‘modal character’—they seem to be ‘necessary-ish’—even though they also seem to be metaphysically contingent. And it is hard to understand how contingent truths could have such a modal character. Scientific essentialism is a doctrine that seems to dissolve this puzzle, by showing that laws of nature are actually metaphysically necessary. I argue that even if the metaphysics of natural kinds and properties offered by scientific essentialism is correct, there are still some metaphysically contingent truths that share the modal character of the laws of nature. I argue that these contingent truths should be considered laws of nature. So even if scientific essentialism is true, at least some laws of nature are metaphysically contingent.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Roberts, John
Keywords: Laws of nature; essentialism; scientific essentialism; counterfactuals
Subjects: General Issues > Laws of Nature
Depositing User: John T. Roberts
Date Deposited: 14 Jul 2009
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:18
Item ID: 4760

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item