Goodwin, William (2009) SUSTAINING A CONTROVERSY: THE NON-CLASSICAL ION DEBATE. In:  International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry Annual Meeting (Philadelphia, August 13-15, 2009).
|Microsoft Word (.doc) |
ABSTRACT: This paper examines a scientific controversy that raged for twenty years in physical organic chemistry during the second half of the twentieth century. After explaining what was at stake in the Non-Classical Ion Debate, I attempt—by examining the methodological reflections of some of the participants—a partial explanation of why this debate was so difficult to resolve. Instead of suggesting a breakdown of scientific method or the futility of appeals to evidence, the endurance of this controversy instead reveals the heuristic character of many of the explanations and predictions generated by theoretical organic chemistry. The results in this case are used to suggest a new role for the study of scientific controversies in revealing the economics of inquiry in scientific fields.
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Social Networking:|| |
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Keywords:||organic chemistry, explanation, Non-classical Ions, controversy|
|Subjects:||General Issues > Structure of Theories|
General Issues > Explanation
Specific Sciences > Chemistry
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
|Conferences and Volumes:|| International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry Annual Meeting (Philadelphia, August 13-15, 2009)|
|Depositing User:||William Mark Goodwin|
|Date Deposited:||24 Jan 2010|
|Last Modified:||07 Oct 2010 11:19|
Actions (login required)