Kelp, Christoph and Douven, Igor (2010) Sustaining a Rational Disagreement. In: [2009] EPSA09: 2nd Conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association (Amsterdam, 21-24 October, 2009) > EPSA 2009 Symposia.
| PDF Download (89Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rationally sustain a disagreement. A growing number of social epistemologists hold that the answer is negative. We point to considerations from the history of science that favor rather the opposite answer. However, we also explain how the other position can appear intuitively attractive.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | social epistemology; peer disagreement |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction |
| Conferences and Volumes: | [2009] EPSA09: 2nd Conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association (Amsterdam, 21-24 October, 2009) > EPSA 2009 Symposia |
| Depositing User: | Igor Douven |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2010 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:19 |
| Item ID: | 5231 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5231 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


