Delhotel, Jean-Michel (2009) Can Structure Save Scientific Realism? [Preprint]
| PDF Download (311Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Physics appears to be in a unique position to withstand antirealist attacks, especially ‘pessimistic induction’ arguments. Such resilience provides an incentive for embracing a ‘structural’ variant of scientific realism. Nevertheless, an examination of the physics-mathematics relationship suggests that whatever determines the success of modelling endeavours lends scant support to structural realism. A closer look at conceptual prerequisites of joint ab initio derivations of (i) Galilean and ‘special’ relativity theories and (ii) classical and ‘quantal’ probabilistic frameworks also fosters scepticism about a major claim of structural realists: that mathematical features of theoretical frameworks – those, in particular, which determine their predictive efficiency – are ultimately rooted in ‘structural’ aspects of the natural world. Further concerns with the central tenets of structural realism are finally briefly addressed, and the question of possible non-instrumentalist alternatives is raised.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Structural Realism pessimistic induction structure physical theories |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Structure of Theories Specific Sciences > Physics General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism General Issues > Theory Change |
| Depositing User: | Jean-Michel Delhotel |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Apr 2010 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:19 |
| Item ID: | 5308 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5308 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


