A Philosopher's View of the Epistemic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.
There are various reasons for favouring Ψ-epistemic interpretations of quantum mechanics over Ψ-ontic interpretations. One such reason is the correlation between quantum mechanics and Liouville dynamics. Another reason is the success of a specific epistemic model (Spekkens, 2007), in reproducing a wide range of quantum phenomena. The potential criticism, that Spekkens' restricted knowledge principle is counter-intuitive, is rejected using `everyday life' examples. It is argued that the dimensionality of spin favours Spekkens' model over Ψ-ontic models. van Enk's extension of Spekkens' model (2007) can even reproduce Bell Inequality violations, but requires negative probabilities to do so. An epistemic account of negative probabilities is the missing element for deciding the battle between Ψ-epistemic and Ψ-ontic interpretations in favour of the former.
||This essay was submitted as part of the required work for the Masters Level course, Part III, in the History and Philosophy of Science Department, Cambridge University, May 2010.
||epistemic interpretation, Spekkens, toy model, Catch 22, chocolate quiz show
||Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics
||21 May 2010
||07 Oct 2010 15:19
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)