AHMED, Arif (2010) CAUSAL DECISION THEORY IS FALSE. UNSPECIFIED.
| Microsoft Word (.doc) Download (123Kb) |
Abstract
Causal Decision Theory (CDT) cares only about the effects of an act, not its causes. The paper constructs a case in which CDT consequently recommends a bet that the agent is certain to lose rather than a bet that the agent is certain to win. CDT is plainly giving wrong advice in this case. It therefore stands refuted.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Other |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Causal Decision Theory, Evidential Decision Theory, Determinism, Compatibilism |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory |
| Depositing User: | Arif Ahmed |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Sep 2010 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 11:20 |
| Item ID: | 5561 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5561 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


