PhilSci Archive

Experimentation versus Theory Choice: A Social-epistemological Account

Weber, Marcel (2010) Experimentation versus Theory Choice: A Social-epistemological Account. In: [2010] Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation: A Challenge to Philosophy of Science (Pittsburgh; October 15-17, 2010).

[img] Microsoft Word
Download (45Kb)

    Abstract

    This paper examines how experimental scientists choose theoretical frameworks as well as their experimental systems for doing research. I start out with Kuhn's claim that there are no (single) algorithms that could determine the coices made by individual scientists. Samir Okasha has recently provided an argument for this claim in terms of social choice theory, which I briefly discuss. Then, I show why this problem is not relevant in an experimental science. There are social mechanisms in place that make sure the community chooses the best framework and a matching experimental system. As historical evidence for this claim, I present the case of classical genetics.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
    Conferences and Volumes: [2010] Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation: A Challenge to Philosophy of Science (Pittsburgh; October 15-17, 2010)
    Depositing User: Marcel Weber
    Date Deposited: 13 Oct 2010 08:37
    Last Modified: 13 Oct 2010 08:37
    Item ID: 8327
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8327

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads