Ahmed, Arif (2010) Smokers and psychos: Egan cases don't work. [Preprint]
| Microsoft Word Download (149Kb) |
Abstract
Andy Egan's Smoking Lesion and Psycho Button cases are supposed to be counterexamples to Causal Decision Theory (CDT). I argue that if well-known Newcomb type cases don't already refute CDT then neither do Egan's cases. In any event Egan's cases add nothing new to whatever case already exists against CDT.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Causal Decision Theory |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Decision Theory |
| Depositing User: | Arif Ahmed |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Oct 2010 07:18 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Oct 2010 07:18 |
| Item ID: | 8341 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8341 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


