Harrington, James
(2008)
Instants and Instantaneous Velocity.
[Preprint]
Abstract
This paper will argue that the puzzles about instantaneous velocity, and rates of change more generally, are the result of a failure to recognize an ambiguity in the concept of an instant, and therefore of an instantaneous state. We will conclude that there are two distinct conceptions of a temporal instant: (i) instants conceived as fundamentally distinct zeroduration temporal atoms and (ii) instants conceived as the boundary of, or between,temporally extended durations. Since the concept of classical instantaneous velocity is well deﬁned only on the second conception of instants, we will conclude that this distinction allows us to avoid the above dilemma. If instantaneous velocity is welldeﬁned then the states of a system at various instants are not logically distinct and thus we cannot generate Zeno’s paradox. However, if we assume that the instants are metaphysically distinct, then instantaneous velocity is not welldeﬁned and thus the second horn of the dilemma about the causalexplanatory role of instantaneous velocity cannot be generated.
Available Versions of this Item
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)

View Item 