PhilSci Archive

Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science

Elliott, Kevin (2010) Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science. [Preprint]

[img] Microsoft Word (Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science)
Phil_Sci_2011_Preprint.doc - Accepted Version

Download (112kB)

Abstract

Although many philosophers have employed the distinction between “direct” and “indirect” roles for values in science, I argue that it merits further clarification. The distinction can be formulated in several ways: as a logical point, as a distinction between epistemic attitudes, or as a clarification of different consequences associated with accepting scientific claims. Moreover, it can serve either as part of a normative ideal or as a tool for policing how values influence science. While various formulations of the distinction may (with further clarification) contribute to a normative ideal, they have limited effectiveness for regulating how values influence science.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Elliott, Kevinke@sc.edu
Keywords: values; inductive risk; value judgments; science and values; public policy
Subjects: General Issues > Ethical Issues
General Issues > Science and Society
General Issues > Science Policy
General Issues > Values In Science
Depositing User: Kevin Elliott
Date Deposited: 11 Dec 2010 04:30
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2010 04:30
Item ID: 8420
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8420

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item