PhilSci Archive

On Sober's Criterion of Contrastive Testability

Lutz, Sebastian (2010) On Sober's Criterion of Contrastive Testability. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
PDF - Draft Version
Download (343Kb) | Preview


    Elliott Sober has suggested his criterion of contrastive testability as an improvement over previous criteria of empirical significance like falsifiability. I argue that his criterion renders almost any theory empirically significant because its restrictions on auxiliary assumptions are to weak. Even when the criterion is modified to avoid this trivialization, it fails to meet other conditions of adequacy for a criterion of empirical significance that follow from Sober's position. I suggest to define empirical significance as empirical non-equivalence to a tautology, because this definition does meet the conditions of adequacy. Specifically, it is equivalent to the standard Bayesian criterion of empirical significance whenever all probabilities are defined and contains falsifiability as a special case. This latter feature is important because those conditions of adequacy that apply to criteria of deductive empirical significance single out falsifiability.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Preprint
    Keywords: empirical significance, testability, empiricism, falsifiability
    Subjects: General Issues > Operationalism/Instrumentalism
    General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
    General Issues > Structure of Theories
    General Issues > Theory/Observation
    Depositing User: Sebastian Lutz
    Date Deposited: 14 Dec 2010 07:08
    Last Modified: 18 Apr 2011 07:37
    Item ID: 8424

    Available Versions of this Item

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads