Franceschi, Paul (2011) The Disanalogy in the Simulation Argument and the Emerald Case. [Preprint]

There is a more recent version of this item available.

Preview

PDF - Draft Version Download (126Kb) | Preview

Abstract

I propose in this paper a solution to the problem arising from the Simulation argument. I describe first Bostrom's Simulation Argument in detail and its inherent problem. I recall then the implicit analogy underlying the Simulation argument. I show then the inadequacy of this analogy, by pointing out a disanalogy between the human situation corresponding to the Simulation Argument and its underlying urn analogy. I also point out that such disanalogy is also present within the Emerald case, another thought experiment imagined by John Leslie. I proceed then to build another urn analogy, which fits more adequately with the human situation corresponding to the Simulation Argument. I draw lastly the consequences of this alternative analogy and its associated line of reasoning on the conclusion of the Simulation Argument.

Available Versions of this Item

• The Disanalogy in the Simulation Argument and the Emerald Case. (deposited 13 Apr 2011 09:34)[Currently Displayed]
  • On the Disanalogy in the Simulation Argument. (deposited 29 Apr 2012 15:17)

Actions (login required)